THANK YOU FOR SUBSCRIBING
Aerospace and Defense Review Weekly Brief
Be first to read the latest tech news, Industry Leader's Insights, and CIO interviews of medium and large enterprises exclusively from Aerospace and Defense Review
Loris Molent AM, DirectorStructural integrity is the ability of all constituent parts of an aircraft’s structure to withstand normal operating loads within approved flight limitations without collapse or unacceptable deformation. Management of aircraft structural integrity (ASI) is required within the operating organisation to ensure that aircraft, which the State has airworthiness responsibility, can operate safely and economically throughout their service life.
Aircraft structures deteriorate from their initial `as manufactured´ condition throughout their service life. There are many reasons for this deterioration; of which fatigue, corrosion, degradation due to environmental factors and accidental or battle damage are significant for military aircraft. Both the aircraft’s operational environment and its actual usage are important factors in determining the rate of this deterioration. This deterioration reduces the ability of aircraft structures to withstand the loads for which they were originally designed and inevitably lead to the retirement of these structures from service for safety or economic reasons.
To maintain airworthiness requires constant vigilance. Lessons from past accidents and incidents should never be forgotten. It is normal and appropriate for the aircraft’ manufacturer to define the ASI management plan for the prescribed life of type. However, it is prudent that the State or operator maintain a high level of ASI competency. This ensures a sovereign capability, some independence from the manufacturer and an ability to question that manufacture’s processes, assumptions and costs. Also, in some cases, the life of type may need to be extended due to delays in acquiring new assets or simply the cost barrier of the new aircraft.
Molent Aerostructures consulting can help build and maintain a sovereign ASI capability. The Director, Mr. Molent has over 36 years experience in the role of an airworthiness engineer/scientist. In addition to providing high-level advice on through life structural airworthiness to the Royal Australian Air Force for a range of aircraft (including the F-35, F/A-18, F-111, PC9 and P3-C Orion), Loris has been attached to both the (then) Australian Civil Aviation Department (1985) and the US Navy (NAVAIR, 1990-1991) in Washington D.C. as an airworthiness engineer. With the US Navy Loris had airworthiness management responsibilities for the F/A-18 fleet as well as the X-31 Enhanced Manoeuvrability Fighter Aircraft.
Up to 2020 Loris was the Head of Emerging Aircraft Structural Integrity at Defence Science and Technology Group, Australia. He was presented with the Minister’s Award for Scientific Achievement in 2010, an Order of Australia Medal in 2016 (for significant contributions to aeronautical engineering) and the USAF’s Jack Lincoln award in 2025 (in recognition of dedicated service and significant contributions to the advancement in aircraft structural integrity).
Loris has contributed significantly to the science of structural airworthiness through research into and development of novel crack growth models, the effects of multiple crack interactions (multi-site damage), advance composite (boron epoxy) bonded repairs, vulnerability of aircraft structures to explosions, aircraft accident investigations and standards for fatigue life monitoring/tracking of agile aircraft and teardown of aging airframes.
-
The focus has always been on practical outcomes, applying innovative methods to real aircraft fatigue, failure and structural challenges.
Today, that depth of experience underpins his consultancy and training practice, focused on advancing aircraft structural integrity through specialized advisory services and education. Reflecting this contribution, Molent was named among APAC’s Top Aircraft Structural Integrity Training and Advisory Providers in 2026.
“The focus has always been on practical outcomes, applying innovative methods to real aircraft fatigue, failure and structural challenges,” says Molent.
Some of this airworthiness advice included the estimation of airframe service lives due to metal fatigue, the structural assessment and review of airworthiness certification basis of new aircraft types, conduct and interpretation of major full-scale airframe test programs leading to in-service modification programs, structural recovery programs subsequent to aircraft accidents and the development of holistic total life risk of structural failure techniques. Notably Loris’ team helped extend the service life of the RAAF F/A-18 and F111 by over ten years.
Loris has been involved with the development and application of advanced bonded repairs. Some significant applications included the reinforcement of the RAAF’s F111 wing pivot fitting and the design of USAF’s C141 wing weep-hole reinforcement. The later helped the USAF bridge the gap between the C141 and C17. Loris’ team also applied several bonded reinforcements to the Boeing 747 fuselage fatigue test article.
Molent’s courses are structured around methods developed through fatigue testing and accident investigation. The curriculum covers aircraft structural failure analysis and prevention, structural integrity familiarization for aircraft and engines, full-scale fatigue design and testing of military aircraft and the structural aspects of accident investigation. Across all courses, conventional, theory-heavy instruction is kept to a minimum. The emphasis is on applying proven methods to real aircraft problems. Each course is tailored to meet the specific requirements of the client. Clients have included Air Forces from Spain, India, Malaysia, Swiss and Finland.
He runs his training sessions as five-day workshops rather than traditional lectures, with active participation encouraged throughout. Attendees bring current challenges into the sessions for discussion and to identify ways forward. The materials are slide-based and supported by real-world failed components that connect analysis with physical outcomes.
Advancing Aircraft Structural Integrity through Applied Expertise
Aerospace organizations across APAC operate within an environment where structural reliability is inseparable from safety, readiness and lifecycle cost control. Aircraft fleets are aging, utilization patterns are shifting and the tolerance for uncertainty in fatigue behavior is diminishing. Executives responsible for engineering oversight are no longer evaluating support purely on technical credentials; they are assessing how effectively expertise translates into usable methods that inform decisions under real conditions.
A persistent challenge lies in bridging theoretical knowledge with the demands of operational fleets. Conventional engineering education often emphasizes foundational theory, yet fleet managers confront issues such as unexpected cracking, evolving load spectra and the need to extend service life without compromising safety. The value of an aerospace engineering consultant is therefore defined by the ability to translate complex structural phenomena into actionable assessments that guide inspection intervals, maintenance planning and risk mitigation.
Another pressure point emerges in the interpretation of structural failures and incidents. Aircraft accident investigations and fatigue-related failures generate significant data, yet extracting insight that can be reused across fleets requires experience that spans testing, analysis and real-world investigation. Decision-makers increasingly favor advisors who can connect lessons from past failures to current structural assessments, ensuring that knowledge is not confined to reports but embedded into ongoing engineering practice.
The effectiveness of training also plays a critical role in sustaining structural integrity across organizations. Traditional lecture-driven formats often fail to engage experienced engineers or address the nuances of their specific fleet challenges. There is growing emphasis on interactive, problem-oriented learning environments where participants can apply concepts directly to their own operational concerns. Training that incorporates case studies from actual incidents, full-scale testing and component-level analysis allows engineering teams to internalize methods rather than merely understand them conceptually.
A further distinction arises in the availability of tools that extend beyond standard methodologies. Organizations are placing increasing importance on practical assessment techniques that can be integrated into existing workflows without requiring extensive reconfiguration. The credibility of such tools depends not only on their effectiveness but also on their validation through scientific publication and peer review. Engineering leaders are cautious of proprietary approaches that lack transparency or independent scrutiny, favoring those that have demonstrated acceptance within the broader technical community.
Loris Molent Within this context, Molent AeroStructures represents a highly specialized choice for organizations seeking applied expertise in aircraft structural integrity. Drawing on over three decades of experience within the Australian Department of Defence’s Science and Technology Group, Molent brings direct exposure to full-scale fatigue testing programs, accident investigations and structural research into both its advisory and training work. Its engagement model focuses on practical outcomes, whether through fatigue life assessments that define inspection thresholds or through workshops that integrate client-specific challenges into the learning process. The use of real-world case studies, including failed components and incident analyses, ensures that knowledge remains grounded in operational reality. Its development of novel fatigue assessment tools, widely adopted by organizations and supported by international publications, further reinforces its position as a trusted partner for engineering teams seeking clarity in complex structural environments.
...Read more
